Lawline

Leading online Continuing Legal Education (CLE) platform. 2,000+ expert-led on-demand courses across 55+ practice areas covering ethics, diversity/inclusion, skills, professionalism, and substantive law including dedicated catalogs for litigation/trial advocacy, IP, immigration, family law, corporate/securities, and more. 150,000+ attorneys trust Lawline. Trusted by 200+ firms. Also serves paralegals (dedicated paralegal CLE courses) and in-house counsel (‘Hot Topics for In-House Counsel’ series). DEI Institute launched with dedicated diversity/equity/inclusion curriculum. Subscription model: Essentials ($229/yr), Plus ($299/yr), unlimited access. Enterprise offering: CLE Solutions suite including CLE Access (firm-wide course library + compliance tracking), CLE Studio (custom course hosting and multi-state accreditation for firms), and CLE Concierge (full-service CLE management). Firm Portal with admin dashboard for tracking attorney CLE progress across multi-state compliance groups. First AI-powered CLE Learning Assistant launched. Founded in 1999 by Alan Schnurman; his son David Schnurman took it over in 2005 and converted it from a TV show into a CLE company, bootstrapping it to $10M revenue (per Sramana Mitra interview). NYC-based. ~20-30 employees. 2,146 LinkedIn followers. Trustpilot 4.7/5 (103+ reviews). Listed in Clio and NBI comparison articles. Competitors: PLI (Practising Law Institute — premium per-program pricing for BigLaw), CeriFi LegalEdge (bundled with Westlaw), LexisNexis CLE, Lorman, National Business Institute. Blog on BigLaw training transformation suggests enterprise ambitions.

Capabilities

Spans 1 product area: Legal Education & Training.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 1 workflow area:

• Firm Operations & Growth

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

• Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.