Delium

Delium is a cloud-based evidence management and eTrial platform for litigators and courts, supporting review, analysis, and presentation of evidence at trial or arbitration. Founded 2016 in Australia. ~13 employees, 361 LinkedIn followers, EV=0 (corrected from 480 — all searches were for Delium Tires, a different company). Two products: Pre-Trial (case analysis and preparation) and eTrial (electronic evidence presentation in hearing rooms). Claims to be ‘the only evidence management software to personalise the presentation of evidence at trial’ with patented presentation functionality. Record Activity Module for trial and arbitration recordkeeping compliance. Key case studies: 80% cost reduction for a major case, 500 elderly plaintiffs government litigation managed seamlessly, sole practitioner scaling case. Security upheld in court: when a party challenged Delium’s security in a divorce case, the court ruled Delium’s protections were adequate. Partnership with elaw.com.au — Delium is the underlying technology for elaw’s eLitigation services in Australia. dtSearch integration for full-text search. Law Institute of Victoria Technophile article covered Delium’s eDiscovery capabilities. Listed on Legaltech Hub and Theorem Legal Marketplace. No G2/Capterra reviews. No Reddit presence. Pricing not published. Australian market primary but arbitration cases extend internationally. Competitors: Opus 2, CaseLines (UK), TrialDirector, eTrialToolkit. Key differentiator: personalised evidence presentation per participant role (judge, barrister, solicitor, witness each see adapted views) with patented technology. Covers full litigation cycle from pre-trial analysis through hearing presentation to post-hearing recordkeeping.

Company Info

• Founded: 2016
• Team size: 1-10 employees
• HQ: Australia
• Sector: Litigation, Case Management

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.