Directory / Case Management / Unicourt Unicourt Est. 2012 HQ United States Employees 38 Updated 2026-04-20
FELL -16 From #31 (2024-02) to #47 today
#1 #5 #10 #25 #50 #100 2024-02: #31 2024-03: #28 2024-04: #28 2024-05: #29 2024-06: #30 2024-07: #29 2024-08: #27 2024-09: #30 2024-10: #34 2024-11: #38 2024-12: #38 2025-01: #39 2025-02: #39 2025-03: #40 2025-04: #40 2025-05: #40 2025-06: #40 2025-07: #40 2025-08: #41 2025-09: #40 2025-10: #43 2025-11: #46 2025-12: #47 2026-01: #47 2026-02: #45 2026-03: #45 2026-04: #45 2026-05: #47
#47 now
Q2 24 Q3 24 Q4 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26 Q2 26 May 26 How this is computed · one composite score, recomputed across all 28 months, ranked on a 3-month moving average
0.19× Hype steady at 0.19× over the 24-month window
0.0× 0.8× 1.5× 2.3× 3.0× 2024-04: 0.16× 2024-05: 0.22× 2024-06: 0.22× 2024-07: 0.20× 2024-08: 0.18× 2024-09: 0.38× 2024-10: 2.05× 2024-11: 0.46× 2024-12: 0.49× 2025-01: 0.85× 2025-02: 0.33× 2025-03: 0.31× 2025-05: 0.23× 2025-06: 0.23× 2025-07: 0.17× 2025-08: 0.19× 2025-09: 0.21× 2025-10: 0.17× 2025-11: 0.18× 2025-12: 0.15× 2026-01: 0.17× 2026-02: 0.10× 2026-03: 0.15× 2026-04: 0.19× 0.19× now Q2 24 Q3 24 Q4 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26 Q2 26 How Hype Index is computed · prospect-to-user intent ratio over the 24-month window
0.06 Flight-risk steady across the window
0.00 0.52 1.04 1.57 2.09 2024-04: 0.030 2024-05: 0.057 2024-06: 0.069 2024-07: 0.057 2024-08: 0.057 2024-09: 0.239 2024-10: 1.818 2024-11: 0.125 2024-12: 0.153 2025-01: 0.153 2025-02: 0.069 2025-03: 0.104 2025-05: 0.062 2025-06: 0.062 2025-07: 0.042 2025-08: 0.062 2025-09: 0.042 2025-10: 0.021 2025-11: 0.026 2025-12: 0.026 2026-01: 0.042 2026-02: 0.021 2026-03: 0.034 2026-04: 0.062 0.06 now
Q2 24 Q3 24 Q4 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26 Q2 26 How Churn Index is computed · flight-risk signal over the 24-month window
Expand all Collapse all
What it is Overview UniCourt provides real-time structured access to state and federal court data through its Legal Data as a Service (LDaaS) platform. Products include the Enterprise API for integrating court data into applications and DART for AI-driven docket analytics.
Company Info
Founded: 2012
Team size: 11-50 employees
HQ: United States
Sector: Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Integrations 14 platforms
Platforms Unicourt integrates with. Depth — where curated — reflects how
native the connection is. Uncurated entries render without a depth dot.
AdvoLogix Azure Synapse DocketBird ECFX InfoTrack Lexitas Litera Foundation Microsoft Fabric PACER PacerPro Python SDK REST API Salesforce Data Cloud Snowflake Deep — bi-directional API Medium — one-way sync / webhook Shallow — middleware / Zapier-class
Community ratings Coming soon Coming soon
Ratings on this page will come from verified practitioners and buyers in the
r/legaltech community — scored against workflow-specific dimensions (accuracy,
citation integrity, onboarding effort, value, support). We're not fabricating
numbers in the meantime. If you've used Unicourt in anger,
help seed the first reviews → Alternatives 6 in Case Management
Other Case Management vendors in the directory.
"Compare" pages are editorial and coming as we build them.