Track With Ease

Est. 2017 HQ United States Employees 4 Funding $1M Updated 2026-02-10
Rank trajectory2024-02 → 2026-05 · 28 months
FELL -14From #606 (2024-02) to #620 today
#583#632#681#729#7782024-02: #6062024-03: #6172024-04: #6902024-05: #6922024-06: #6872024-07: #6102024-08: #6782024-09: #7552024-10: #7532024-11: #6832024-12: #6232025-01: #6182025-02: #6272025-03: #6922025-04: #6942025-05: #6962025-06: #6212025-07: #6172025-08: #6172025-09: #6222025-10: #6222025-11: #6212025-12: #6202026-01: #6232026-02: #6262026-03: #6302026-04: #6272026-05: #620 #620 now Q2 24Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26May 26

How this is computed · one composite score, recomputed across all 28 months, ranked on a 3-month moving average

What it is Overview

TrackWithEase is a niche practice-management product built specifically for residential real-estate law firms that need a contract-to-close operating system rather than a generic law-firm CRM. The strongest verified story is practical: one place for documents, contacts, dates, tasks, workflows, e-signatures, and automated client updates so closings move without constant status calls and calendar chasing. The current pricing page is clearer than the old analysis: $139 per user per month with unlimited e-signatures, a 99.9% uptime SLA, and vendor-claimed bank-grade security. Public traction appears modest - the open-web signal is mostly vendor testimonials and software-comparison listings - but the fit for small and midsize real-estate shops is clearer than the prior draft suggested.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2017
  • Team size: 1-10 employees
  • Funding: $1M
  • HQ: United States
  • Sector: Transactions, Real Estate

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Integrations 2 platforms

Platforms Track With Ease integrates with. Depth — where curated — reflects how native the connection is. Uncurated entries render without a depth dot.

Deep — bi-directional API Medium — one-way sync / webhook Shallow — middleware / Zapier-class

Community ratings Coming soon
Alternatives 6 in Contract Lifecycle

Other Contract Lifecycle vendors in the directory. "Compare" pages are editorial and coming as we build them.

Funding
  • 1MTotal funding reported by the TLTF directory · founded 2017 · as crawled 2026-02-09source ↗

Round-by-round data (dates, round names, investors) is not in our source crawl — only the total is shown.

Visit Track With Ease → Claim this page Flag incorrect data