Jurorsearch

Est. 2020 HQ United States Updated 2026-02-10
Rank trajectory2024-02 → 2026-06 · 29 months
CLIMBED +11From #794 (2024-02) to #783 today
#734#752#770#788#8062024-02: #7942024-03: #7952024-04: #7972024-05: #7972024-06: #7952024-07: #7922024-08: #7932024-09: #7902024-10: #7932024-11: #7922024-12: #7902025-01: #7882025-02: #7922025-03: #7952025-04: #7942025-05: #7952025-06: #7902025-07: #7892025-08: #7872025-09: #7872025-10: #7842025-11: #7832025-12: #7432026-01: #7442026-02: #7462026-03: #7902026-04: #7892026-05: #7852026-06: #783 #783 now Q2 24Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26Jun 26

How this is computed · one composite score, recomputed across all 29 months, ranked on a 3-month moving average

What it is Overview

Jury selection management platform for litigation teams. Chicago-based, founded by Dan Johnson. Cloud-based platform for organizing voir dire: juror surveys, background research, oral responses, attorney notes, real-time team collaboration during jury selection. Also added mock trial management (Dec 2023, covered by LawNext/Bob Ambrogi). Pricing: from $999/month (GetApp), free tier available, unlimited users per subscription. Capterra/Software Advice: 5/5 (2 reviews). Listed on National Society for Legal Technology, ILTA LegalTechHub under Jury Selection. LawNext: described as ‘leading voir dire management solution.’ Targets trial attorneys, jury consultants, and litigation teams. Works best with 2+ collaborators per FAQ. 30 monthly branded searches. No Reddit mentions. Very niche but well-defined category — few purpose-built competitors in digital jury selection management.

Capabilities

Spans 1 product area: Jury Selection and Management.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 1 workflow area:

  • Research & Analysis

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2020
  • Team size: 1-10 employees
  • HQ: United States
  • Sector: Litigation, Legal Research

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Community ratings Coming soon
Alternatives 6 in Court Technology

Other Court Technology vendors in the directory. "Compare" pages are editorial and coming as we build them.

Visit Jurorsearch → Claim this page Flag incorrect data