Jus Mundi is a Paris-based legal tech platform specializing in international law and arbitration research. AI-powered database of arbitral awards, case documents, treaties, and rules across ICC, ICSID, PCA, LCIA, and other institutions. Founded 2017. $33.1M total funding ($22M Series B, Sep 2024). 133 employees. Global presence: Paris, New York, London, Singapore, 80+ countries. Core capabilities: comprehensive international arbitration search engine, citator functionality, arbitrator profiles, treaty database, Jus AI generative assistant (launched Sep 2024 with Series B), Jus AI 2 agentic upgrade (Sep 2025). ISO 27001 certified (Jan 2025). Charles Russell Speechlys case study: ‘50% faster research’ and ‘80% quicker’ arbitrator conflict checks — Tom Snider (partner): ‘When it comes to arbitration case law and sources, Jus Mundi is best in class.’ Publishes Jus Mundi Arbitration Review (JMAR) academic journal and Daily Jus newsletter. Georgetown Law Library: ‘Jus Mundi and Kluwer Arbitration offer the broadest coverage.’ Harvard Law Library includes Jus Mundi in arbitration research guide. LCAM partnership for blockchain arbitration awards. Law.com coverage of Jus AI 2 agentic AI release. No public pricing found. Near-zero Reddit presence (specialized product). No G2/Capterra reviews (niche market).
Company Info
- Founded: 2017
- Team size: 51-200 employees
- Funding: $36.0M
- HQ: France
- Sector: Legal Research
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Jus Mundi is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Jus Mundi addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
International arbitration team manages proceedings across London, Singapore, and New York with different procedural rules, time zones, and tribunal preferences — no single platform coordinates hearing bundles, real-time transcription, and virtual hearing rooms across jurisdictions
Arbitration counsel preparing for an investor-state dispute needs to find all awards involving a specific bilateral investment treaty clause, know the arbitrator's track record on jurisdictional challenges, and identify the opposing party's litigation history — but arbitral awards are scattered across ICC, ICSID, PCA, LCIA databases with no unified search, and many awards are confidential or paywalled
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Jus Mundi
Cross-border dispute arises (investment treaty claim, commercial arbitration, construction dispute) → counsel needs to assess merits by researching prior awards, identify arbitrators, check treaty applicability, and prepare case strategy before filing request for arbitration
After Jus Mundi
After research phase → findings feed into statement of claim / memorial drafting, arbitrator challenge motions, jurisdictional objections, quantum calculations. Post-award: enforcement research across jurisdictions, annulment proceedings research.
Integrations & hand-offs
Jus Mundi → case management (matter files, deadlines); → document drafting (memorials, witness statements informed by award research); → arbitral institutions (ICC, ICSID, PCA filing); → client reporting (case assessment memos). Jus AI outputs feed into counsel's working documents.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…