AI-powered preliminary Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) patent analysis platform that benchmarks ideas against ~200 million patent documents across 170 jurisdictions. Primarily serves investors and entrepreneurs assessing patent infringement risks before funding or launching — no evidence of adoption by law firms or patent attorneys found as of March 2026. Founded 2023, part of Nobody Studios venture studio, ~$550K revenue with 5-person team. Recognized by The LegalTech Fund in their Early-Stage IP Market report (2026). Technical architecture and AI methodology undisclosed. Offers interactive ‘Edit Mode’ allowing users to refine AI-selected patent evidence. Competitive landscape includes prior art search tools (Cypris, xlscout, Patlytics) but Evalify occupies a narrower niche — pitch-deck-to-preliminary-FTO — that hasn’t been independently compared to attorney-grade FTO analysis.
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: United Kingdom
- Sector: IP
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Evalify is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Evalify addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Patent attorney conducting a prior art search for a client's invention spends 2-3 days manually searching USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature databases — reading hundreds of abstracts, mapping claims to prior art references, and still worrying they missed something in a Chinese or Japanese patent that wasn't translated. The search costs the client $5,000-15,000 and the attorney still can't guarantee completeness
In-house IP team asked to evaluate whether a new product infringes competitor patents — evidence-of-use analysis requires manually comparing product features against hundreds of patent claims, which takes weeks of attorney time at $500/hour and still produces incomplete results
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…