Practice Management

Curo365

Est. 2016 Salt Lake City, UT, US Updated 2026-03-19
cloudmicrosoft-dynamicsbillingpractice-management
○ Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Curo365

Curo365 (Salt Lake City, UT, est. 2016, bootstrapped, $1.3M revenue, ~12 employees) is a Microsoft Dynamics 365-based legal practice management platform built by PrenticeWorx, a Gold Microsoft Partner. Leverages existing Microsoft tools (Outlook, Teams, SharePoint) to unify client acquisition, matter management, billing, document management, and accounting. Microsoft Marketplace listed. Software Advice: 4.5/5 (16 reviews). LawPay integration. Listed in Law Society of Ontario’s lawyer training resources — institutional endorsement. Active Reddit presence on r/legaltech with positive sentiment (recommended for time tracking, workflow automation, Microsoft integration). One r/Lawyertalk user notes 20-user minimum (unconfirmed by vendor), suggesting mid-size firm target. Very recent interest (migration threads from NetDocs/Genius/Nexl, March 2026). Security relies on Microsoft’s infrastructure — Azure AD for identity, Microsoft’s SOC 2/ISO 27001 for the platform. No Curo365-specific security audit found. No independent journalist coverage. No named customer deployments or case studies published.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2016
  • Team size: ~12 employees
  • HQ: Salt Lake City, UT
  • Revenue: $1.3M estimated (Getlatka)

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Curo365 is used in these workflows:

Billing, Time & Finance Firm Operations & Growth Document Review & Management

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Curo365 addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Attorneys reconstruct their day at 9pm, guessing at time entries — studies show 10-15% of billable hours vanish when you don't track in real time

Billing, Time & Finance 90 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Solo attorney paying $500+/month across 6 different software tools that don't share data — needs one system that actually handles the basics without nickel-and-diming

Firm Operations & Growth 99 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10)

Documents scattered across email, shared drives, attorney desktops, and filing cabinets — paralegal can't find the key document when it's needed for court or a deposition

Document Review & Management 75 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data

Firm Operations & Growth 137 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…