Drafting & Automation

COREJUR

Goiânia, GO, Brazil Updated 2026-03-19
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with COREJUR

Brazilian legal automation platform combining AI, BPM, RPA, and document assembly into a unified workflow system for law firms and legal departments. Based in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. 2,367 LinkedIn followers. Key capabilities: automated legal document generation (‘Redator’ module), workflow management, RPA for repetitive legal tasks, ChatGPT natively integrated (per COO LinkedIn post). STF (Brazil’s Supreme Court) procured licenses for R$372,600 in 2025. Also serves CGE Goiás (state comptroller). Integrations with Totvs (major Brazilian ERP). AI research collaboration with CEIA (Centro de Excelência em Inteligência Artificial). Featured at Prêmio Análise DNA Fenalaw (innovation award) for Corejur Trabalhista (labour law module). Selected for Prêmio Sebrae Startups. Silver sponsor at C Law Experience 2026. Presented at Fenalaw 2024 and 2025. ABES featured article. Udemy training course: 4.5/5 (37 ratings). Claims to manage 150,000+ legal processes (unverified whether across all clients or single deployment). LGPD compliance stated. Unfunded per Tracxn — bootstrapped. CEO: Renato Naves, COO: Saulo Cardoso. Portuguese-language product serving Brazilian market. Brazil has 1.3M+ lawyers — the largest legal market outside the US.

Company Info

  • HQ: Goiânia, GO, Brazil
  • CEO: Renato Naves
  • Sector: Legal Workflow Automation

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. No English-language reviews or independent testing. Product primarily serves the Brazilian Portuguese-speaking market.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, COREJUR is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems COREJUR addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

NDAs and routine contracts take 3-7 days because every single one routes through legal — no self-service for standard terms

Document Drafting & Automation 120 vendors affected In-house counsel · Legal ops · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data

Firm Operations & Growth 137 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel

Small firm creates the same lease, will, motion to dismiss, or discovery request from scratch every time — no forms library, no document automation, and setting up templates in most PM tools requires a consultant

Document Drafting & Automation 105 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…