IP Management

Continux

Est. 2003 Munich, Germany Updated 2026-03-19
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Continux

Cloud-based intellectual property management platform from Germany, founded 2003 by Elif Levin. Manages patents, trademarks, and other IP assets with secure collaboration, multi-client capability, tailored views for different user groups, and management information dashboards. Serves patent law firms, IP departments, and corporate IP teams. Capterra rated 4.8/5 (11 reviews). EU-hosted (Finland/Helsinki or Germany/Nuremberg-Falkenstein). Founded as a small IP law firm tool, evolved into enterprise IP management platform. Continux Enterprise is the main product.

Who It’s For

  • Patent law firms in the DACH region managing IP portfolios for multiple clients
  • Corporate IP departments tracking patents, trademarks, and deadlines
  • Small to mid-size IP practices needing affordable cloud IP management

What We Haven’t Verified

  • Primarily European/DACH-focused — international coverage unclear
  • Small team (1-10 employees) after 20+ years suggests niche positioning
  • Pricing not publicly available
  • No Reddit or English-language community mentions found

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Continux is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Continux addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

In-house IP team managing 5,000+ patents across 40 countries tracks renewal deadlines, annuity payments, and maintenance fees in spreadsheets — a missed deadline in one jurisdiction means losing patent protection permanently, and the cost of defensive re-filing (if even possible) dwarfs the renewal fee

Filing & Compliance 21 vendors affected In-house counsel · Legal ops · Large firm (51–200) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

IP law firm prosecution team handling 500+ active patent applications across USPTO, EPO, JPO, and CNIPA uses a different docketing system than the client's in-house team — deadlines get double-entered or missed in translation, office action responses are tracked in email threads, and neither side has real-time visibility into prosecution status

Communication & Collaboration 38 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Legal ops

Solo IP practitioner manages 200 active trademark registrations across multiple clients and tracks renewal deadlines, office action responses, and new filing conflicts in a spreadsheet — one missed deadline means a client loses their mark and the attorney faces a malpractice claim

Filing & Compliance 12 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · trademark-attorney · IP-paralegal

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…