ClaimWise is an AI-powered patent analysis and prosecution workflow platform for patent attorneys. Provides claim construction, patentability assessment, reference numeral consistency checks, jurisdiction-specific compliance, and patent application draft review. London-based, founded 2023. Stanford CodeX TechIndex listed. Claims hundreds of patent attorneys in US and EU use the platform. Deployed in 15+ countries. Features ‘ClaimAssist’ for real-time patent drafting feedback. Active LinkedIn presence with technical content (Amazon 1-Click patent analysis, InterDigital vs Disney analysis). Presented at IP Service World. Claims Editor integrates with MS Word.
Key Capabilities
- Claim construction: AI-generated claim constructions and identification of construction issues
- Patentability analysis: Automated assessment of patent application strength
- Draft review: Reference numeral consistency checks, jurisdiction-specific compliance
- Claims Editor: MS Word integration for amending and formatting claims
- Multi-jurisdiction: Supports patent prosecution across US and EU jurisdictions
Who It’s For
Designed for patent attorneys and patent agents at IP firms and corporate IP departments. Relevant for both patent prosecution and IP litigation claim analysis.
What We Haven’t Verified
- No G2, Capterra, or user reviews found
- Named firm customers not disclosed
- AI accuracy metrics not published
- Funding status unclear
- Pricing not available
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, ClaimWise is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems ClaimWise addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Legal research costs $400-600/hour in associate time and takes hours of manual digging — searching Westlaw/Lexis, reading irrelevant results, synthesizing case law. Clients increasingly refuse to pay for research hours on invoices. AI can compress a 4-hour research memo into 20 minutes, but most firms have no approved tool
IP law firm prosecution team handling 500+ active patent applications across USPTO, EPO, JPO, and CNIPA uses a different docketing system than the client's in-house team — deadlines get double-entered or missed in translation, office action responses are tracked in email threads, and neither side has real-time visibility into prosecution status
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…