Cellebrite

Est. 1999 Vienna, VA Updated 2026-03-19

digital-forensics mobile-forensics ediscovery data-collection ufed endpoint-intelligence

Publicly traded (NASDAQ: CLBT) digital intelligence and investigative analytics company. Full-year 2025 revenue: $475.7M (19% YoY growth), $481M ARR. 1,001-5,000 employees, 96,862 LinkedIn followers. Serves 5,000+ agencies in 150 countries. HQ: Vienna, VA (originally from Israel). Known primarily for UFED (Universal Forensic Extraction Device) — the industry-standard mobile forensics tool used by law enforcement and enterprise legal teams. UFED pricing: ~$3,700 for ‘UFED 4PC Ultimate SW Renewal’ per public procurement records; ~$10K/year per Reddit. Enterprise eDiscovery solutions: Cellebrite Endpoint Intelligence for data collection/processing, Cellebrite Inseyets for review and analytics, and new Case-to-Closure SaaS platform for cloud-native eDiscovery. Both Relativity and Everlaw natively process Cellebrite collection data. Acquired Corellium (Dec 2025, $16.1M ARR). ACEDS partner. Formed Cellebrite Federal Solutions Inc. (2024) for US government. As a publicly traded company, subject to SOX compliance and SEC reporting. Reddit r/ediscovery, r/digitalforensics actively discuss the product. Controversial in privacy communities for phone unlocking capabilities (r/privacy, r/Android) but widely respected in forensics/eDiscovery. Enterprise eDiscovery is a secondary market — primary market is law enforcement forensics.

Company Info

Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Cellebrite is used in these workflows:

Document Review & Management

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Cellebrite addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

eDiscovery costs are insane — traditional vendors charge per-GB processing fees that can hit $100K+ for a single matter, making it economically impossible for small-to-mid firms to run proper discovery

Document Review & Management 55 vendors affected Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel · Large firm (51–200)

eDiscovery tools require a dedicated specialist to operate — Relativity needs an admin, but most small/mid litigation teams don't have one and need something a paralegal can use after a 30-minute demo

Document Review & Management 30 vendors affected Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel

500K documents to review, contract attorneys burning out after 4 hours of screen-staring, nobody knows if the review is consistent across 20 reviewers — and the partner watching the budget bleed

Document Review & Management 62 vendors affected Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Government

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…