Casepoint

Updated 2026-02-10

Casepoint is a government-grade AI-powered eDiscovery and data discovery platform for corporations, government agencies, and law firms. Core capabilities: legal hold, cloud collections, ESI processing, AI-powered review (TAR), early case assessment, production, FOIA requests, compliance rules management, and custom dashboards. Founded in Tysons, VA. Merged with OPEXUS under Thoma Bravo majority investment (Jan 2025) — branded as ‘OPEXUS+Casepoint’ pending rebrand. Also acquired mLINQS (Jul 2025) for regulatory/compliance expansion. Strong security posture: FedRAMP Moderate AND High authorized, DOD Impact Level 4/5/6, GovRAMP, SOC 1, SOC 2, CMMC Level 2 (Jan 2026). ‘Currently the only legal technology provider that operates at the highest standard of security.’ G2 4.7/5 (25 reviews). Reddit sentiment strongly positive in r/ediscovery: ‘most functional equivalent of Relativity without the cost,’ ‘learning curve is lower than Relativity,’ ‘their team is top notch.’ Positioned as Relativity alternative for government and enterprise. No public pricing. Keyword volume entirely generic (‘case and point’ = 18.1K/mo) — branded volume only 50/mo for ‘casepoint ediscovery.‘

Capabilities

Spans 7 product areas: Electronic Discovery, Legal Holds, Document , Review and , Analysis, Information , Governance.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 3 workflow areas:

Filing & Compliance — Timelines
Research & Analysis — Early Case Assessment
Document Review & Management

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Casepoint is used in these workflows:

Document Review & Management Specialist #38 of 68

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Casepoint addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

eDiscovery costs are insane — traditional vendors charge per-GB processing fees that can hit $100K+ for a single matter, making it economically impossible for small-to-mid firms to run proper discovery

Document Review & Management 5 vendors affected Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel · Large firm (51–200)

eDiscovery tools require a dedicated specialist to operate — Relativity needs an admin, but most small/mid litigation teams don't have one and need something a paralegal can use after a 30-minute demo

Document Review & Management 4 vendors affected Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

500K documents to review, contract attorneys burning out after 4 hours of screen-staring, nobody knows if the review is consistent across 20 reviewers — and the partner watching the budget bleed

Document Review & Management 5 vendors affected Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Government legal team processes hundreds of FOIA requests and internal investigations per year — each one requires collecting, reviewing, and producing thousands of documents with mandatory redaction of PII, deliberative process privilege, and law enforcement exemptions. No affordable eDiscovery infrastructure designed for recurring government-scale review, just enterprise tools priced for litigation

Document Review & Management 2 vendors affected Government · In-house counsel

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…