CaseManagerPro by Lucid IQ

Dallas, TX, US Updated 2026-03-19

CaseManagerPro by Lucid IQ (Dallas, TX, founded 1999) is a cloud-based legal case management platform specializing in MDL, mass tort, and complex litigation. One of the longest-running legal SaaS platforms (cloud since 2003). Deployed at AmLaw 100 firms including McDermott Will & Emery and Hunton Andrews Kurth. Estimated ~$2.1M revenue (Growjo). Capterra: 5/5 (1 review). Listed on multiple software directories. Presented at LegalTech New York. NASA SEWP V procurement provider. Offers custom training, implementation, and consulting in blocks of hours. SECURITY CONCERN: SmartAdvocate reported CaseManagerPro was hit by a ransomware attack — no public response from Lucid IQ found, no remediation details disclosed, and no SOC 2 or security certifications found publicly. LucidIQ also operates a separate M&A advisory/tech due diligence business.

Company Info

Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, CaseManagerPro by Lucid IQ is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems CaseManagerPro by Lucid IQ addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system

Communication & Collaboration 61 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · small-firm · Government

Managing 200+ open PI cases with medical records, deadlines, and lien tracking in spreadsheets — one missed statute of limitations and the firm faces malpractice

Filing & Compliance 72 vendors affected Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · Paralegal

Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data

Firm Operations & Growth 137 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel

PI firm outgrew Clio — 500+ open matters, complex intake routing, and the managing partner wants Salesforce-level dashboards but the current PM tool can't deliver

Firm Operations & Growth 9 vendors affected Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…