Remote litigation platform built specifically for virtual depositions, mediations, arbitrations, and court proceedings. Atlanta-based Public Benefit Corporation, founded 2022, ~7 employees. A legal-specific alternative to Zoom/Teams — features include integrated evidence management, court reporter integration, secure video conferencing, and recording chain of custody. SOC 2 Type 1 certified covering all five trust service criteria (security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, privacy) — more comprehensive than many larger vendors. Featured at ABA TECHSHOW 2023 Startup Pitch Competition. Listed on LawNext as ‘Best Depositions and Hearings Software.’ ACEDS listing confirms evidence management capabilities. Born from pandemic necessity — but all press coverage dates from 2022-2023. No news, blog posts, or PR from 2024-2026, raising questions about whether the company is quietly operating or has stalled. Post-pandemic return to in-person depositions may have reduced market urgency. No named customers or case references found.
Company Info
- Founded: 2022
- Team size: ~7 employees
- HQ: Atlanta, Georgia
- Structure: Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)
- Security: SOC 2 Type 1 (all five trust service criteria)
What We Haven’t Verified
No named customers or case references found. Pricing not publicly available — value proposition unclear vs. cheap generic video platforms. All press coverage from 2022-2023; no activity since mid-2023. Post-pandemic return to in-person proceedings may have reduced market urgency. Court reporter integration details unspecified. No independent practitioner reviews. No Reddit practitioner discussion. Recording format, export capabilities, and enterprise scalability (SSO, data residency) not documented.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Calloquy is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Calloquy addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
International arbitration team manages proceedings across London, Singapore, and New York with different procedural rules, time zones, and tribunal preferences — no single platform coordinates hearing bundles, real-time transcription, and virtual hearing rooms across jurisdictions
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…