Aviso Urgente

Updated 2026-03-19

Brazilian legal practice management platform. Founded 1975 in Goiânia as a court notice distribution service — now in its 51st year. Product name: Control JUS, a cloud-based SaaS with modules for CRM, case management, court publication monitoring (covers all national court diaries, state official diaries, and 80+ electronic court panels), jurisprudence database, agenda/deadline tracking, financial management, and AI-powered legal document creation (launched ~Feb 2026). 51-200 employees, 1,774 LinkedIn followers. Legal entity: ‘Aviso Urgente - Clipping e Softwares LTDA.’ Serves law firms and government legal departments across Brazil. OAB-CE (Ceará Bar Association) partnership provides free access to key modules for bar members. Free weekly online training (Tue/Thu 10am). LGPD compliant (confirmed 2019). Presented at Fenalaw 2024. Brazil-only, Portuguese language. Competes with Projuris, Themis, Advbox, and other Brazilian legal PM tools. Differentiates on 50+ year history of court publication monitoring depth. Unfunded (Tracxn).

Company Info

Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Aviso Urgente is used in these workflows:

Communication & Collaboration Firm Operations & Growth

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Aviso Urgente addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system

Communication & Collaboration 61 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · small-firm · Government

Solo attorney paying $500+/month across 6 different software tools that don't share data — needs one system that actually handles the basics without nickel-and-diming

Firm Operations & Growth 99 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10)

Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data

Firm Operations & Growth 137 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · In-house counsel

Where it fits in your workflow

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…