Practice Management
Advise Brasil
Advise is a 23-year-old Brazilian legal practice management platform (‘software jurídico’) serving thousands of law firms and corporate legal departments (‘milhares de escritórios’). The platform provides court process monitoring (vendor claims access to 100M+ lawsuits in the Brazilian court system), deadline tracking, and case workflow management. Founded by José Carlos Vargas, headquartered in Londrina, Paraná. Has mobile app (Advise Hub) on iOS and Android that monitors 240 official gazettes, plus a separate ‘Advise Prawo’ product for high-volume process management. Partnership with OAB Maranhão (Brazilian Bar Association) provides free app access to Bar members in that state. Actively developing AI capabilities (March 2026 Instagram post). Has LGPD compliance infrastructure including dedicated privacy contact (lgpd@advise.com.br) and publishes LGPD educational content. Support via phone, chat, WhatsApp, and email. OAB Maranhão reported app issues in June 2025 but ReclameAqui shows no complaints in last 6 months. In the competitive Brazilian legal software market, Advise competes against Projuris (often ranked #1), Advbox (#2 in some lists), Astrea, SAJ ADV, Aurum, Easyjur, and Juridiq. Portuguese-language only with no English-language market presence. No presence on G2, Capterra, or other English-language review platforms.
Company Info
- Sector: Legal Tech
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Advise Brasil is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Advise Brasil addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Managing 200+ open PI cases with medical records, deadlines, and lien tracking in spreadsheets — one missed statute of limitations and the firm faces malpractice
Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…